[Nagiosplug-devel] New threshold syntax (New thread)

Vonnahme, Nathan nathan.vonnahme at bannerhealth.com
Fri Apr 25 03:22:43 CEST 2008



> -----Original Message-----
> From: nagiosplug-devel-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:nagiosplug-
> devel-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Thomas
Guyot-Sionnest
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:25 PM
> To: Nagios Plugin Development Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Nagiosplug-devel] New threshold syntax (New thread)



> I haven't had a single reply to this. Any objections or comments?

I replied on 4/11 but mostly agree with everything you said... but I
think the SI is in a small but self-righteous minority in their
definition of a GB, and we should stick with `ls` and `df`.

> During a chat in IRC it was suggested that unit would make a better
> replacement to uom. Also uprefix could be used instead of uom_prefix.

+1.  'unit' is better for readability.

> Additionally, in regard to those who prefer the --<metric> <threshold>
> syntax, we could make that as a second pass; so we would do:
> 1st minor release with --metric support
> 2nd minor (or 1st major) release removing legacy thresholds support
(-w,
> - -c, etc)

+1.






More information about the Devel mailing list