[Nagiosplug-devel] RFC: check_disk trying to be clever re: mountpoints
John P. Rouillard
rouilj at cs.umb.edu
Thu May 18 15:20:03 CEST 2006
In message <7126EF02-E249-408F-918D-05135BE639E7 at mac.com>,
Ton Voon writes:
>On 18 May 2006, at 17:03, sean finney wrote:
>
>> i think what happened was at some point (1.4.2 maybe?), this behaviour
>> disappeared. i recieved a couple bugs about it in the debian BTS, so
>> i added a patch that the restores the functionality, if my memory
>> servers me correctly.
>
>John has come down on "this behaviour is wrong" with a good example
>of why, which I am swaying towards. Sean, is there a good counter-
>example for when this behaviour is desirable?
Since Sean had a couple of bug reports he has a couple of use cases in
the opposite direction. I can see it being useful if you have systems
that mix directory/mount points. E.G. on some systems /tmp is a mount
point and on other's it sits on the root filesystem. Still valid to
make sure you have at least 100G free space in either case.
I handle that by a masochistic set of hostgroups and set algebra so I
have different checks on the two system types. Others may not want to.
-- rouilj
John Rouillard
===========================================================================
My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions.
More information about the Devel
mailing list