Bugs item #913633, was opened at 2004-03-10 09:28
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mattkent
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=397597&aid=913633&group_id=29880
Category: None
Group: v1.3.0 beta3
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Ben Johnson (darkstar101)
>Assigned to: Matthew Kent (mattkent)
Summary: check_http does not send port in Host field of GET request
Initial Comment:
I need the port reflected in the Host: field of the GET
request. Siteminder uses this info in applying security
authorizations.
here's my check_http version: check_http
(nagios-plugins 1.3.1) 1.24.2.4
Here's ngrep sniffs showing the request to the web
server from check_http and links.
$ check_http -H msp21754 -p 61616 -u /
T 10.163.68.117:49879 -> 10.163.180.47:61616 [AP]
GET / HTTP/1.0..Host: msp21754..User-Agent:
check_http/1.24.2.4 (nagios-plugins ).
$ links --source http://msp21754:61616/
T 10.163.68.117:49866 -> 10.163.180.47:61616 [AP]
GET / HTTP/1.1..Host: msp21754:61616..User-Agent:
ELinks (0.4.2; Linux; )..Referer:
http://msp21754:61616/..Accept: */*..Accept-Encoding:
bzip2, gzip..Accept-Charset: us-ascii, ISO-8859-1,
ISO-8859-2, ISO-8859-3, ISO-8859-4, ISO-8895-5,
ISO-8859-6, ISO-8859-7, ISO-88
59-8, ISO-8895-9, ISO-8859-10, ISO-8859-13,
ISO-8859-14, ISO-8859-15, ISO-8859-16, windows-1250, window
s-1251, windows-1252, windows-1256, windows-1257,
cp437, cp737, cp850, cp852, cp866, x-cp866-u, x-mac,
x-mac-ce, x-kam-cs, koi8-r, koi8-u, koi8-ru,
TCVN-5712, VISCII, utf-8..Accept-Language: en..Connection:
Keep-Alive....
I can work around the problem by specifying the IP to
connect to with -I and putting host:IP in the -H parameter:
$check_http -I 10.163.180.47 -H msp21754:61616 -p 61616
-u /
T 10.163.68.117:49894 -> 10.163.180.47:61616 [AP]
GET / HTTP/1.0..Host: msp21754:61616..User-Agent:
check_http/1.24.2.4 (nagios-plugins )....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Matthew Kent (mattkent)
Date: 2004-11-20 13:37
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=983566
I know it seems silly to have to specify the port twice, but
the way it functions currently best fits the description of
the flags. Plus I'd rather let the user send whatever host
header they'd like instead of forcefully appending a port.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=397597&aid=913633&group_id=29880